For anyone who has paid attention in during a statistics class, it is common knowledge that the more people questioned for a survey and the more diversity there is, the less bias there will be in the results. In a survey, a professional has a set population in mind that he is trying to gather an accurate representation for. In order to properly represent these people, he has to ask as many different people part of that population in order to keep the bias to a minimum. There was no guarantee of protecting children from explicit material until 1968 (Dame in the Kimono). The rating process has a very large possibility of bias because the movies are rated by only 12-15 parents who watch the movie and write down what they think the movie should be rated after they finish watching it (Glickman). In the case of the MPAA, the small group of 12-15 parents that watch and rate movies for the MPAA chosen to represent the entire population of America (more than 300,000,000 people, not to mention all of the people in other countries who also watch American made films) is definitely going to lead to bias and inaccurate ratings.
Dan Glickman, CEO of the MPAA, stated that the parents chosen to rate the movies are to watch the movie and rate it based upon how comfortable they would be with allowing their child to see that movie. After learning this is how they rate the movies, there is an enormous amount of bias that is present in the rating process. Every parent raises their child differently in one way or another so there is no way that 12-15 parents opinion’s can accurately represent how every parent would rate a movie. Those chosen to rate a movie are parents because according to Dame in the Kimono, effective since 1968, the U.S. government can protect children from explicit material and not adults. The content used to determine the rating has definitely changed over the years. In today’s films, PG is generally considered a children’s movie. Back in the 70’s, PG was referred to as “pretty gory” by cynics (Dame in the Kimono). The majority of movies rated PG today do not contain any brutal violence or gore of any kind.
In Dan Glickman’s interview, he stated that about 70 percent of all movies are rated and 30 percent of movies are unrated. The rating of a movie does have an effect on how many people go see the movie (Glickman). After watching the Interview with director Kirby Dick about his 2006 documentary "This Film is Not Yet Rated," I was shocked to find out that not only are the 12-15 people randomly selected parents, they are all also from the Los Angeles area. On top of that, the parents aren’t given any guidelines to follow while rating the movies (Dick).
Not until after I had seen the interview with Kirby Dick did I know that there are no guidelines to follow when the selected few are rating a movie. The directors and producers of movies are forced to change material present in their movies based upon a couple parent’s personal opinions. These parents could simply rate a movie “R” just because they don’t like the film. These parents have way too much control over the ratings of movies. The lack of guidelines and small of parents chosen have driven producers crazy for many years now. They have every right to be very upset by the mediocre rating system. Until there are guidelines to rating movies for these parents and a set of people chosen to rate each and every movie to be rated by the MPAA, there will continue to be a battle between producers of movies and the MPAA and a large amount of bias. In my opinion, the amount of bias present is ridiculous and very unacceptable and the producers and directors of movies have every right to be angry about the movie rating process.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I read your blog and I agree with the section on statistical data. The MPAA definitely needs a larger, more diverse board in order to represent all Americans. I think it is crazy such a important organization is so small. I don’t agree with your statement that the MPAA could “simply rate the movie ‘R’ just because they don’t like the film”. On the MPAA website they show the guidelines they use to rate movies. http://www.mpaa.org/FlmRat_Ratings.asp
ReplyDeleteI was confused about your point about how the rating of movies has changed over the years. You said, “Back in the 70’s, PG was referred to as “pretty gory” by cynics (Dame in the Kimono). The majority of movies rated PG today do not contain any brutal violence or gore of any kind.” Although this might be true, are you trying to say that it is a bad thing? Overall I liked your essay because it allowed me to see the other side of this issue.
Well I know that it is highly unlikely to inaccurately rate a movie based on your likes or dislikes of the movie, but in the Kirby Dick interview, he said that they aren't given any guidelines while rating a movie. I think that after his movie "This Film is not yet Rated" was released, they did set some guidelines. I was pressed for time so I actually didn't have a chance to visit the MPAA website...
ReplyDeleteOh and about the whole 70's PG rating thing, it is not a bad thing at all. I meant to say more about how this shows how society has changed and how the material parents believe is appropriate for their children has changed.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you 100%. I too believe the rating system is very biased and unprofessional. Although I would like to add that i talked to parents and they see it another way; they believe that they should put harsher ratings on violence just as they do for sex scenes. In my opinion, if you do not wish for your child to see those movies then you can handle it yourself. My parents for example let my 13 year old brother watch what he wants, they think that if he wants to see it then he will anyway. These days' it is hard to keep children from sneaking peaks of rated R movies, and not to mention they are always on TV. Times have changed that is for sure and its time they take that into consideration.
ReplyDeleteAndrew I like how you mention that having random parents rating movies is bad because they can just rate the movies to their comfort. The evidence gives how movie ratings work; it gives some history and description of movies. It shows how movie ratings are biased from parents. Also it shows that the parents are given no training or anything so they just rate movies from what they think. I think the evidence and the description you have given relates by showing how bias movie ratings really are, and how they have changed throughout history.
ReplyDelete